Wow, oh, wow, #brands look so #beautiful today! #LetThereBeColor #LetThereBeLove #LoveWins pic.twitter.com/QpATQIcC1x
— Monica Vasile (@monicavasile24) June 26, 2015
Wow, oh, wow, the #internet looks so #beautiful today! #LetThereBeColour#LetThereBeLove #LoveWins
#justice #equalrights #therightway
„No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”
No such thing in the Constitution. Inform yourself.
This is a fragment from the motivation of the Supreme Court. What exactly do you mean?
Am I wrong in assuming that is not this fragment’s existence or not in the Constitution that represents the „problem” here?
There is no such „right” in the Constitution.
It might be unfair, then!
What is unfair?
For people, any kind of people, not to have the same rights as you have! #equal
They do have the same rights. What they want is extra rights. The Constitution does not give anybody any right to get married, but homosexuals don’t care about the Constitution. They want to violate other people’s rights.